AI-Generated Image Falsely Depicts Cameraman Filming Alex Honnold’s Taipei 101 Free-Climb
The Viral Claim and Its Emotional Pull
In late January 2026, Alex Honnold once again redefined the limits of human endurance by becoming the first person to free-solo climb Taipei 101, the iconic 508-metre skyscraper in Taiwan. The ascent, streamed live by Netflix and covered extensively by international media, was immediately cemented as one of the most extraordinary climbing feats of the modern era. Within days of the climb, an image began circulating widely across X,[1] Threads,[2] Facebook,[3] and YouTube,[4] purporting to show a cameraman hanging off the side of Taipei 101 with one hand while filming Honnold mid-ascent.
The image struck a powerful emotional chord. It appeared to suggest that the production crew had matched Honnold’s risk, placing a cameraman outside the building without visible safety equipment. Captions praised the supposed bravery of the cameraman, framing him as an unsung hero who risked death to capture history. In several posts, the image was described as “behind-the-scenes proof” of how extreme the filming had been. The visual spectacle, combined with the already awe-inspiring nature of Honnold’s climb, made the image highly shareable and largely unquestioned.
What the Image Purports to Show
The circulating image depicts two figures suspended hundreds of metres above the city. One figure, assumed to be Honnold, appears to be climbing the exterior facade. The other, positioned just below and to the side, appears to be a cameraman clinging to the building while pointing a camera directly at the climber. The framing implies simultaneous exposure to extreme danger, reinforcing a narrative that the documentation of the climb was as perilous as the climb itself.
For viewers unfamiliar with how modern extreme sports broadcasts are produced, the image seemed plausible. It fit neatly into a broader cultural myth that extraordinary feats must be captured through equally extraordinary and reckless methods.
CyberPoe’s Verification and AI Detection
CyberPoe subjected the image to both technical analysis and contextual verification. Using Google’s SynthID[1] detection system, a tool designed to identify content created with Google’s artificial intelligence technologies, the image returned a “very high” confidence rating of AI generation. This alone significantly undermines any claim that the image documents a real moment from the climb.
Visual forensics further reinforce this conclusion. The proportions of the human figures relative to the building surface appear subtly distorted, and the interaction between bodies and structure lacks the precise physical realism seen in authentic high-altitude photography. The sense of gravity in the image feels stylized rather than natural, a common characteristic of AI-generated visuals that prioritize dramatic composition over physical accuracy.
Contradictions With Verified Footage and Photography
Beyond internal inconsistencies, the image directly contradicts verified footage and photographs from the Taipei 101 climb. Authentic images captured by AFP and broadcast during the live stream show Honnold wearing a red shirt, black trousers, yellow climbing shoes, and carrying a white chalk bag. In the viral image, his clothing and equipment differ noticeably, including grey trousers, darker footwear, and a red-colored chalk bag.
Such discrepancies are not trivial. High-profile events like Honnold’s climb are meticulously documented, with consistent visuals across multiple outlets and camera angles. Any genuine image from the ascent would align closely with this established visual record. The absence of any matching footage or photographs showing a cameraman outside the building further undermines the image’s credibility.
Netflix’s broadcast and subsequent reporting also clearly outline how the climb was filmed. The production relied on drones, fixed exterior cameras, and interior or offset vantage points designed to ensure crew safety. At no point did credible reporting suggest that a cameraman physically hung off the building alongside Honnold.
How and Why the Image Spread
The image’s rapid spread highlights a broader vulnerability in the modern information environment. AI-generated visuals are increasingly used to embellish real events, adding fictional layers that heighten drama and emotional impact. In this case, the image exploited a common assumption that documenting extreme feats requires equally extreme risk-taking by camera crews.
Because the underlying event was real and well documented, the fabricated image benefited from contextual credibility. Many viewers assumed it was simply an unseen angle rather than questioning its origin. The absence of disclaimers or labels identifying the image as synthetic allowed it to circulate as supposed documentary evidence
Why This Matters
Misrepresenting AI-generated imagery as real documentation distorts public understanding of how events unfold and how media operates. It also unfairly attributes reckless behavior to production crews who, in reality, prioritize safety and rely on advanced technology to capture dangerous feats without unnecessary human risk. Over time, such fabrications erode trust in authentic journalism and make it harder for audiences to distinguish real documentation from synthetic spectacle.
CyberPoe Conclusion
The image claiming to show a cameraman hanging off Taipei 101 to film Alex Honnold’s free-solo climb is not authentic. It is an AI-generated creation, flagged by Google’s SynthID detection system and contradicted by verified footage, photographs, and broadcast details from the event. While Honnold’s climb itself was real and historic, the circulating image is a fictional embellishment designed to amplify drama.
CyberPoe | The Anti-Propaganda Frontline 🌍
